Symphonizing the science: NASA Twins Study team begins integrating results
2017-03-21
It begins with one instrument. Then another joins in. Before you know it, a grand symphony is playing before your eyes. NASA Twins Study researchers are eager to integrate their results and create a symphony of science.
Preliminary findings were discussed during the Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop in January, and now enthusiasm abounds as the integration process begins. The investigators are a unique group of researchers with different expertise associated with genetic and physiological areas of study.
While Scott Kelly spent a year in space aboard the space station, his identical twin brother, retired astronaut Mark Kelly, spent that year on Earth. Comparing the twins’ biological samples will yield important information on how spaceflight affects the human body. These trailblazing genetic studies will help NASA keep astronauts safe on a journey to Mars.
The symphony begins with data. Big data. The Twins Study was established as a multi-omics pilot study for sharing data. Typically, research is done individually and results are made public in scientific journals that kick off discussions of findings. However, this study is different. From the start, Twins Study investigators have planned to integrate their results before publishing.
Each investigation is like an instrument. On its own, it plays solo music. But put them all together and you have something incredible.
“The beauty of this study is when integrating rich data sets of physiological, neurobehavioral and molecular information, one can draw correlations and see patterns,” said Tejaswini Mishra, Ph.D., research fellow at Stanford University School of Medicine, who is creating the integrated database, recording results and looking for correlations. “No one has ever looked this deeply at a human subject and profiled them in this detail. Most researchers combine maybe two to three types of data, but this study is one of the few that is collecting many different types of data and an unprecedented amount of information.”
The next step in the Twins Study is composing the symphony. As individual researchers analyze and compile their data, they will be sharing their individual and integrative analyses with the Stanford team headed by Mike Snyder, Ph.D., who will then apply different methods to further integrate it into big data sets and begin composing a masterful ensemble. After that, the investigators will begin to review the integrated data set to either confirm or modify their initial findings.
“There are a lot of firsts with this study, and that makes it exciting,” said Brinda Rana, Ph.D., associate professor of psychiatry, University of California San Diego School of Medicine. “A comparative study with one twin in space and one on Earth has never been done before. Each investigation within the study complements the other.”
The researchers view the study as a new piece of music where they learn their individual parts and then join together with the conductor to play the musical score. Through the integration of data from biochemical markers, cognitive ability, gut bacterial composition and biomolecules (DNA, RNA, proteins, metabolites), they hope to identify health-associated molecular effects of spaceflight to protect astronauts on future missions.
“The human systems in the body are all intertwined, which is why we should view the data in a holistic way,” said Scott M. Smith, Ph.D., NASA manager for nutritional biochemistry at NASA’s Johnson Space Center. He conducts biochemical profiles on astronauts, and his research is targeted to specific metabolites—the end products of various biological pathways and processes.
“If we see protein changes, then we can look at the RNA,” said Rana. “And if we see RNA changes, then we can look at the DNA. By integrating data, we can make a timeline to give us an indication if it is a precursor or result of genetics. Does a specific gene regulate protein change, or do other genes? Once we know, we can establish cause and effect and use molecules to measure.”
Sometimes the science surprises us.
Susan Bailey, Ph.D., professor of radiation cancer biology and oncology with the College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, Colorado State University, received preliminary results contrary to her hypothesis. Telomeres shorten as we age, so she expected to see Scott Kelly’s telomeres shorten after living in space almost a year. But, to her surprise, the preliminary results showed an increase in average telomere length, or an increase in the population of cells that have longer telomeres. Now, she is searching for mechanistic data to explain what she is seeing. To determine if it is an anomaly or not, she is looking at Scott Kelly’s exercise schedule, food logs and behavioral data. She also is looking at data from Andy Feinberg, M.D., M.P.H., director, Center of Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, who is analyzing methylation patterns, a major factor in gene regulation and gene expression, such as which genes are turned on and off.
Bailey will also look at data from Chris Mason, Ph.D., associate professor, Department of Physiology and Biophysics Weill Cornell Medicine, for mutations in the promoter region of the telomerase to help form a correlation and confirm or refute her preliminary finding.
Mason said, “Both the universe and the human body are complicated systems, and we are studying something hard to see. It’s like having a new flashlight that illuminates the previously dark gears of molecular interactions. It is a more comprehensive way to conduct research.”
“There is no doubt, the learnings from integrating our data will be priceless,” said Emmanuel Mignot, M.D., Ph.D., director of Center for Sleep Science and Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine. He studies the immune system and is enthusiastic to study specific immune cell populations, because many of the other immune studies focus only on general factors.
The orchestra is only warming up now. As data from individual investigations start filtering into the integrated composition, researchers and NASA eagerly await the results. When the full score of integrated data is ready, the summary of results will be published in late 2017 or early 2018. After that, individual investigators will publish theme papers with more detailed findings of the various investigations. As NASA embarks on its next journey, the results of the Twins Study will provide a front-row seat in this grand performance of human exploration.
NASA’s Human Research Program (HRP) is dedicated to discovering the best methods and technologies to support safe, productive human space travel. HRP enables space exploration by reducing the risks to human health and performance using ground research facilities, the International Space Station and analog environments. This leads to the development and delivery of a program focused on: human health, performance and habitability standards; countermeasures and risk-mitigation solutions; and advanced habitability and medical-support technologies. HRP supports innovative, scientific human research by funding more than 300 research grants to respected universities, hospitals and NASA centers to over 200 researchers in more than 30 states.
Image Credit: NASA
Amy Blanchett
Laurie Abadie
NASA Human Research Engagement & Communications
Preliminary findings were discussed during the Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop in January, and now enthusiasm abounds as the integration process begins. The investigators are a unique group of researchers with different expertise associated with genetic and physiological areas of study.
While Scott Kelly spent a year in space aboard the space station, his identical twin brother, retired astronaut Mark Kelly, spent that year on Earth. Comparing the twins’ biological samples will yield important information on how spaceflight affects the human body. These trailblazing genetic studies will help NASA keep astronauts safe on a journey to Mars.
The symphony begins with data. Big data. The Twins Study was established as a multi-omics pilot study for sharing data. Typically, research is done individually and results are made public in scientific journals that kick off discussions of findings. However, this study is different. From the start, Twins Study investigators have planned to integrate their results before publishing.
Each investigation is like an instrument. On its own, it plays solo music. But put them all together and you have something incredible.
“The beauty of this study is when integrating rich data sets of physiological, neurobehavioral and molecular information, one can draw correlations and see patterns,” said Tejaswini Mishra, Ph.D., research fellow at Stanford University School of Medicine, who is creating the integrated database, recording results and looking for correlations. “No one has ever looked this deeply at a human subject and profiled them in this detail. Most researchers combine maybe two to three types of data, but this study is one of the few that is collecting many different types of data and an unprecedented amount of information.”
The next step in the Twins Study is composing the symphony. As individual researchers analyze and compile their data, they will be sharing their individual and integrative analyses with the Stanford team headed by Mike Snyder, Ph.D., who will then apply different methods to further integrate it into big data sets and begin composing a masterful ensemble. After that, the investigators will begin to review the integrated data set to either confirm or modify their initial findings.
“There are a lot of firsts with this study, and that makes it exciting,” said Brinda Rana, Ph.D., associate professor of psychiatry, University of California San Diego School of Medicine. “A comparative study with one twin in space and one on Earth has never been done before. Each investigation within the study complements the other.”
The researchers view the study as a new piece of music where they learn their individual parts and then join together with the conductor to play the musical score. Through the integration of data from biochemical markers, cognitive ability, gut bacterial composition and biomolecules (DNA, RNA, proteins, metabolites), they hope to identify health-associated molecular effects of spaceflight to protect astronauts on future missions.
“The human systems in the body are all intertwined, which is why we should view the data in a holistic way,” said Scott M. Smith, Ph.D., NASA manager for nutritional biochemistry at NASA’s Johnson Space Center. He conducts biochemical profiles on astronauts, and his research is targeted to specific metabolites—the end products of various biological pathways and processes.
“If we see protein changes, then we can look at the RNA,” said Rana. “And if we see RNA changes, then we can look at the DNA. By integrating data, we can make a timeline to give us an indication if it is a precursor or result of genetics. Does a specific gene regulate protein change, or do other genes? Once we know, we can establish cause and effect and use molecules to measure.”
Sometimes the science surprises us.
Susan Bailey, Ph.D., professor of radiation cancer biology and oncology with the College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, Colorado State University, received preliminary results contrary to her hypothesis. Telomeres shorten as we age, so she expected to see Scott Kelly’s telomeres shorten after living in space almost a year. But, to her surprise, the preliminary results showed an increase in average telomere length, or an increase in the population of cells that have longer telomeres. Now, she is searching for mechanistic data to explain what she is seeing. To determine if it is an anomaly or not, she is looking at Scott Kelly’s exercise schedule, food logs and behavioral data. She also is looking at data from Andy Feinberg, M.D., M.P.H., director, Center of Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, who is analyzing methylation patterns, a major factor in gene regulation and gene expression, such as which genes are turned on and off.
Bailey will also look at data from Chris Mason, Ph.D., associate professor, Department of Physiology and Biophysics Weill Cornell Medicine, for mutations in the promoter region of the telomerase to help form a correlation and confirm or refute her preliminary finding.
Mason said, “Both the universe and the human body are complicated systems, and we are studying something hard to see. It’s like having a new flashlight that illuminates the previously dark gears of molecular interactions. It is a more comprehensive way to conduct research.”
“There is no doubt, the learnings from integrating our data will be priceless,” said Emmanuel Mignot, M.D., Ph.D., director of Center for Sleep Science and Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine. He studies the immune system and is enthusiastic to study specific immune cell populations, because many of the other immune studies focus only on general factors.
The orchestra is only warming up now. As data from individual investigations start filtering into the integrated composition, researchers and NASA eagerly await the results. When the full score of integrated data is ready, the summary of results will be published in late 2017 or early 2018. After that, individual investigators will publish theme papers with more detailed findings of the various investigations. As NASA embarks on its next journey, the results of the Twins Study will provide a front-row seat in this grand performance of human exploration.
NASA’s Human Research Program (HRP) is dedicated to discovering the best methods and technologies to support safe, productive human space travel. HRP enables space exploration by reducing the risks to human health and performance using ground research facilities, the International Space Station and analog environments. This leads to the development and delivery of a program focused on: human health, performance and habitability standards; countermeasures and risk-mitigation solutions; and advanced habitability and medical-support technologies. HRP supports innovative, scientific human research by funding more than 300 research grants to respected universities, hospitals and NASA centers to over 200 researchers in more than 30 states.
Image Credit: NASA
Amy Blanchett
Laurie Abadie
NASA Human Research Engagement & Communications